|
Dear Editor:
A Sunday editorial praised Barack Obama’s speech in reply to the
airing of his pastor’s outrageous claims about America.
The Pilot saw the speech as a “remarkable” effort toward “a
larger conversation on race”.
What does the senator’s poor choice of religious mentors have to
do with race relations in the first place?
Is Obama explaining that his pastor hates
America
because he happens to be black?
Why did he not instead explain in his speech why he would follow
such a man in reaching the most fundamental beliefs one can hold?
If the Obama campaign wishes to turn the page on race, the
senator needs to stop explaining so many events in terms of race.
Most Americans today do not think much about race relations really.
After all, there should be no such thing in a color-blind
society.
Racial
discrimination has been unlawful in the
United States
in every way since 1964.
A
larger conversation emphasizing bigotry is not now helpful or needed.
We are one nation finally.
Hopefully someday our government and even the media will learn
that slicing and dicing racial claims is itself an expression of soft
bigotry on all sides. America has long practiced the
equality that makes all of us free to succeed no matter what others may
happen to believe.
Free
citizens anywhere can ask for little more.
|